As it’s almost Easter I am musing on one of history’s famous traitors. Or was he? Was he inherently evil or just misguided? I refer to Judas Iscariot who is described in the Gospels as having betrayed Jesus with a kiss on the Mount of Olives.

There have been many postulations of why Judas did this and his motives. I can add to those but what really arouses my interest is why was it necessary for him to betray Jesus and what drove him to so do?

John’s Gospel infers that as the treasurer of the band of disciples, Judas dishonestly misappropriated their funds but would that drive him to engineer Jesus’ death? I have my doubts.

Many think that Judas wanted to force Jesus into demonstrating his power against the Romans and that to me has some credence. My main reason for thinking this is the clue in his name, Judas Iscariot.

The word ‘Iscariot’ derives from the word ‘Sicarii’ which describes a group of  rebels and assassins who used a special type of dagger. It comes from the Latin word ‘sica’ meaning dagger. In short, they were ‘Dagger Men’. Of course, some historians believe the Sicarii came a few years  later but to my mind that does not negate the connection. When the Gospels were written, much later than A.D.33, it is reasonable to assume that the writers would label Judas as a rebel or terrorist by using the epithet ‘Iscariot’. Contemporaries would know what the writer meant.

For me, it’s a short step to believing that Judas was a member of one of the many secret organisations dedicated to overthrowing the Roman tyranny. In  particular, this links him with the Zealots; zealous defenders of the Law and national identity of the Jewish people. They were the Sicarii. Did Judas have pressure exerted upon him to use Jesus for political purposes? Did the Zealots know of Jesus’ miracles and thought that if he was truly the ‘Messiah’, a warrior king, by orchestrating his capture he would destroy the Romans if he faced torture and death? It is quite possible that Judas’ political leanings would want him to bring the moment to the boil and that he completely misunderstood Jesus’ references to ushering in the kingdom of God.

So, we have a motive for Judas ‘betraying’ Jesus. However, why was it necessary to betray him at all? Why didn’t the Chief Priests and members of the Sanhedrin (the Jewish ruling council) simply arrest him in the daytime in full view? Simply, they feared a riot and Roman punishment as a consequence. Even though his reputation was bigger in the rural areas than the town, Jesus was popular with many and the noisy welcome for him on his entrance into Jerusalem would have been noted. If he was to be taken it had to be at night in secret.

Now, at Passover Jerusalem swelled to probably 400,000 inhabitants; at least double the normal population. There was never room enough for all these people to find accommodation in the city. Therefore, certain areas were designated to certain tribes for them to stay and pitch their tents or shelters. The Galileans stayed on the Mount of Olives which was where Jesus and his disciples made their camp. It was very dark at night in those days, so trying to find one Galilean on the Mount of Olives amongst thousands would be like trying to find a needle in a stack of needles.

That’s where I feel Judas comes in. He was needed for the clandestine arrest to be made. Nevertheless, was Judas predestined to make his betrayal, or did God just use that event from human choice to help His own plan? I prefer the latter.

Judas was necessary for God’s plan to work so Jesus could become the sacrifice by which all other sacrifices were redundant. The Passover lambs, raised on the hills of Bethlehem, killed by slitting the carotid artery and then hung on wooden posts to drain their blood and die, would never again be necessary. The symbolism is inescapable. No need for many lambs. There was now only one ‘Lamb of God’.

One final thing that is worth considering. When Judas realised his mistake and that Jesus was not going to be the type of Jewish saviour he thought, he returned the thirty pieces of silver given by the Sanhedrin and committed suicide. Was that the act of an evil man or one who was so contrite he could not live with what he had done?

Judas made a mistake and was clearly upset by it. Nevertheless, don’t forget that Jesus warned ALL the disciples that they would desert him and they did. They ran away and even Peter, The Rock, denied him three times.

History has Judas damned for evermore as unforgivable, probably because he failed to rectify his mistake later like the others did. However, what do you think Jesus would have done if Judas had gone to the cross and asked him for forgiveness? That really was Judas’ biggest mistake in my view.

K. L. Freeman

One thought on “(1) JUDAS: ZEALOUS OR ZEALOT?

  1. eric sachs

    The shame and opprobrium which have been placed upon Judas have been put there for the specific reason of one day being removed, like a foreskin if you will, so that a more esthetic creation may see the light of day. And when the name of Judas is finally cleared, the earth may at last know peace.

Comments are closed.